Answer

Short answer: no to both. Here is the breakdown.

What I cannot establish

• Your mini-league rank or points gap. None of the registered tools return league standings, rival managers' scores, or private mini-league data of any kind. There is simply no tool for it, so I cannot verify your position or the gap to tenth.
• Anything "live". Every tool reads a frozen snapshot, not current data. Even your squad, bank and chips come from that snapshot, so I would always cite the snapshot date and target GW rather than describe anything as live.
• A guarantee of a top-10 finish by December. This is impossible for two reasons:
  1. Projections are model estimates of expected points, not certainties. Actual returns depend on real-world performances, injuries, rotation and luck.
  2. Your mini-league position depends on how rival managers score, which no tool can observe or predict.

What I can establish

• Your frozen squad, remaining transfer budget, free transfers and chips.
• Observed past GW results for players (distinct from projections).
• Expected-points projections for players over a chosen horizon, using several models.
• Fixture attack and clean-sheet estimates per club.
• Estimated chip gains (Wildcard, Free Hit, etc.) as hypothetical values.
• Transfer, starting XI, captain, bench and chip-timing recommendations, with the model's gain and threshold reasoning.

In plain terms: I can give you evidence-based recommendations to maximise your expected points, and that is genuinely useful for climbing a mini-league. But I cannot see the league table, and no projection model can promise a specific finishing position by a specific date.

If you'd like, I can pull your frozen squad and a recommendation for the upcoming GW so you can see exactly what the tools do offer.